Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 5980, 2022 04 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1788316

ABSTRACT

The burdens and trends of gastric cancer are poorly understood, especially in high-prevalence countries. Based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019, we analyzed the incidence, death, and possible risk factors of gastric cancer in five Asian countries, in relation to year, age, sex, and sociodemographic index. The annual percentage change was calculated to estimate the trends in age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) and age-standardized death rate (ASDR). The highest ASIR per 100,000 person-years in 2019 was in Mongolia [44 (95% uncertainty interval (UI), 34 to 55)], while the lowest was in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) [23 (95% UI, 19 to 29)]. The highest ASDR per 100,000 person-years was in Mongolia [46 (95% UI, 37 to 57)], while the lowest was in Japan [14 (95% UI, 12 to 15)]. Despite the increase in the absolute number of cases and deaths from 1990 to 2019, the ASIRs and ASDRs in all five countries decreased with time and improved sociodemographic index but increased with age. Smoking and a high-sodium diet were two possible risk factors for gastric cancer. In 2019, the proportion of age-standardized disability-adjusted life-years attributable to smoking was highest in Japan [23% (95% UI, 19 to 28%)], and the proportions attributable to a high-sodium diet were highest in China [8.8% (95% UI, 0.21 to 33%)], DPRK, and the Republic of Korea. There are substantial variations in the incidence and death of gastric cancer in the five studied Asian countries. This study may be crucial in helping policymakers to make better decisions and allocate appropriate resources.


Subject(s)
Stomach Neoplasms , Global Burden of Disease , Global Health , Humans , Incidence , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Risk Factors , Sodium , Stomach Neoplasms/epidemiology
2.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 28(6): 792-800, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1558736

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Viral reactivation is frequently detected in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation and is associated with worse outcomes. However, the efficacy and safety of antiviral therapy in these patients remain unknown. This review aims to assess the effects of antiviral therapy on mortality, viral reactivation, and adverse events in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. METHODS: Data sources were Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and reference lists. The study included randomized controlled trials that compared antiviral therapy with placebo, standard care, or no treatment. Participants were critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Intervention was antiviral therapy. Assessment of risk of bias used the Cochrane risk of bias tool. For methods of data synthesis, risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model for meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. RESULTS: Nine trials with a broad spectrum of critically ill patients were included. No association was found between antiviral therapy and all-cause mortality at the longest follow-up (nine trials, 1790 patients, RR 0.93, 95%CI 0.79-1.11, I2 3%). Trial sequential analysis showed that the cumulative Z curve crossed the futility boundary establishing sufficient evidence. No association was also found between antiviral therapy and 28-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, 60-day mortality, or 90-day mortality. However, antiviral therapy was associated with a reduction in viral reactivation (five trials, 644 patients, RR 0.23, 95%CI 0.14-0.37, I2 0%). Trial sequential analysis showed that the cumulative Z curve crossed the trial sequential monitoring boundary for benefit establishing sufficient evidence. Antiviral therapy was not associated with an increased risk of renal insufficiency (eight trials, 1574 patients, RR 0.88, 95%CI 0.73-1.05, I2 0%). CONCLUSIONS: No association between antiviral therapy and mortality was found, but antiviral therapy reduced viral reactivation without increasing the risk of renal insufficiency in critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation.


Subject(s)
Critical Illness , Renal Insufficiency , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Critical Illness/therapy , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Renal Insufficiency/etiology , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL